🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.